Price drops in and around Roelofarendsveen
More homes in and around Roelofarendsveen whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Geestweg 62
Apartment at Geestweg 62 in Roelofarendsveen (Tuinbouwgebied neighbourhood). The home was built in 1975 and has 27 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Sassenheim (7.3 km). The nearest primary school is RKBS De Kiem (1.4 km).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 699,000−€ 51,000
- Listed for sale17 Jun 2026€ 750,000
Property details
- Living area
- 27 m²
- Construction year
- 1975
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- —
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Tuinbouwgebied, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Liveability index: amenities
- Clearly fewer facilities than average-0.1208 score
- Distance to charging point
- No charging point in the neighbourhood4.1 km
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away13.1 km
- Distance to secondary education
- Very far away10 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place6.43 ratio
- Child-friendliness (score)
- Little child-friendly22 score
- Secondary schools within 3 km
- No secondary school within 3 km0
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Very close (<50 m)34 m
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Very close3 m
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)439,154 m²
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Greenhouse area within 1 km
- Large-scale greenhouse horticulture nearby46.74 ha
- Wind turbines within 3 km
- Many wind turbines nearby9
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources6
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-15.3 mm/yr
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)0.68 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Agriculturalagricultural
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 540,000
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- One within 1 km1
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)997 m
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Nearby (within area of influence)750 m
- Distance to nearest greenhouse
- Greenhouse nearby (<500 m), possible light or noise nuisance3 m
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away14.3 km
- Within Wbb soil location
- Within registered soil locationYes
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.3%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels49%
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.9%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.585 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away26.9 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)26.9 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.2 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood387 m
- Distance to military terrain
- Well away from military terrain12.4 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away910 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
27th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 537 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 213 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 5% of schools
35th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 174 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 297 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
46th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 95 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
21st percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 19: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
75th percentile: high · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 228 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
15th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 84 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 9% of schools
72nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 259 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
97th percentile: high · DIA · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 208 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
76th percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 129 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.