Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Geuzenkade 79 2
Apartment at Geuzenkade 79 in Amsterdam (Geuzenhofbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1934 and has 45 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label D. The nearest railway station is De Vlugtlaan (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Admiraal De Ruyterschool (290 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced6 Jul 2026€ 465,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale18 Jun 2026€ 500,000
Property details
- Living area
- 45 m²
- Construction year
- 1934
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 532,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold (leasehold end date: 01-09-2033)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Geuzenhofbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby24
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.4%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated220 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,567 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical610 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.652 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
55 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 47 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 391 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
86th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 286 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.