Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
-3.3%
-1.4%
-16.0%
-3.3%
-6.1%
-4.8%
-2.5%
-3.8%
-1.7%
-2.6%
-4.2%
-4.0%
-8.3%
-6.7%
-4.3%
-4.3%
-2.9%
-4.3%
-0.7%
-5.3%
-2.4%
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Glitterstraat 190
Apartment at Glitterstraat 190 in Amsterdam (Grunder/Koningshoef neighbourhood). The home was built in 2007 and has 98 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Ganzenhoef (458 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare basisschool Wereldwijs (440 m).
Know first, then bid.
Price & status history
- Under offer23 Jul 2026
- Relisted2 Jul 2026€ 425,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 445,000
Property details
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Features
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 1 construction plan within 1 km · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 454 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
21st percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 62 pupils · total 511 pupils
Disadvantage score 168: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
52nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
14th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
5th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
44th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
10th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
77th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 64: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
4th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
25th percentile: low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
1st percentile: low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
39th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 76% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.