Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Gooise Kant 13
Terraced house at Gooise Kant 13 in Amsterdam (Gooise Kant neighbourhood). The home was built in 2016 and has 109 m² of living space, a 126 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Ganzenhoef (960 m). The nearest primary school is De Blauwe Lijn (470 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jun 2026€ 645,000−€ 30,000
- Relisted13 Jun 2026€ 675,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 685,000
Property details
- Living area
- 109 m²
- Plot
- 126 m²
- Construction year
- 2016
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 706,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 31-05-2059)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Gooise Kant, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1099 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)3%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure6
- Distance to nearest LPG filling station
- Within effect area140 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot57 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average35%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space86 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,049 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,006 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 19 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
52nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 64 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 111 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 119 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 222 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
4th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
25th percentile — low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 72% passed · CE avg 5.9 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.