Price drops in and around Almere
More homes in and around Almere whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Harderwijkoever 107
Apartment at Harderwijkoever 107 in Almere (Stedenwijk Midden-oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1984 and has 96 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Almere Muziekwijk (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is Islamitische Basisschool Al Iman (186 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted1 Jul 2026€ 370,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 380,000
Property details
- Living area
- 96 m²
- Construction year
- 1984
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 351,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stedenwijk Midden-oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1315 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1205 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)23%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)79.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot10,166 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions14 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)72 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.1%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.411 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away28.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 3 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 408 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
no recent test score · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 124 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 417 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 39% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 195 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
30th percentile — average · 84% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 79 exam candidates
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO
7th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 325 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 280 exam candidates
25th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.