Price drops in and around Diemen
More homes in and around Diemen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Havikskruid 133
Apartment at Havikskruid 133 in Diemen (Kruidenhof neighbourhood). The home was built in 1982 and has 61 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Diemen Zuid (417 m). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische Basisschool De Ark (309 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jul 2026€ 345,000−€ 40,000
- Listed for sale12 Jun 2026€ 385,000
Property details
- Living area
- 61 m²
- Construction year
- 1982
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 344,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kruidenhof, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated250 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share18.2%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.4%
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)5%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.8%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.9%
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-15.1 mm/yr
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot301 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values7.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.555 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away13.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)10.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
44th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 384 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
19th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
75th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 353 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
28th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
80th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 212 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
25th percentile — low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 72% passed · CE avg 5.9 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
17th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 101 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/PRO · 20 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.