Price drops in and around Koudum
More homes in and around Koudum whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 4 price cuts in and around Koudum, averaging −4.9%. The biggest cut was € 30.000 (Heidenskipsterdyk 38 A, It Heidenskip). Last updated 17 September.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Heidenskipsterdyk 38 A
Semi-detached at Heidenskipsterdyk 38A in It Heidenskip (Heidenschap neighbourhood). The home was built in 1957 and has 466 m² of living space, a 9,892 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Workum (3.7 km). The nearest primary school is Ontmoetingsschool De Klimbeam (3.9 km).
estimate€ 425,000
overbidding€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 895,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 925,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 41.7% With children+10.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 16.7% Single-person−23.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 41.6% Other multi-person+13.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 82% Owner-occupied+25 pt vs the Netherlands
- 3% Social housing−25 pt vs the Netherlands
- 15% Private rental+1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 97% Dutch background+24.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 1.5% Rest of Europe−7.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 1.5% Outside Europe−17 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Heidenschap neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
1 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 100% Other+66.8 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: very good
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Features
Stations
Schools
24th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 20: more disadvantage than 59% of schools
4th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 129 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 1% of schools
88th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 101 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 18% of schools
12th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 54 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 15 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

