Price drops in and around Landsmeer
More homes in and around Landsmeer whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Ilpenstein 28
Terraced house at Ilpenstein 28 in Landsmeer (Havenzathe neighbourhood). The home was built in 1970 and has 132 m² of living space, a 145 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Noord (3.1 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool De Stap (45 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)30 Jun 2026
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 600,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 625,000
Property details
- Living area
- 132 m²
- Plot
- 145 m²
- Construction year
- 1970
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 593,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Havenzathe, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Well above national average€ 670,000
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.6%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Distance to indoor swimming pool
- Far away5.1 km
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away9.3 km
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime77.8 per 1,000 residents
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure10
- Secondary schools within 3 km
- No secondary school within 3 km0
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot77 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average36%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space51 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,512 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield993 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
9 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 22% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 160 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 210 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
97th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 217 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 594 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 87 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 254 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 127 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
64th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
no exam results · PRO
38th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 88 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
64th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 90 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · HAVO/VWO · 96 exam candidates
38th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
4th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 25 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.