Price drops in and around Almere
More homes in and around Almere whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jan van Goyenstraat 77
Terraced house at Jan van Goyenstraat 77 in Almere (Tussen de Vaarten N.- Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1999 and has 87 m² of living space, a 142 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Almere Parkwijk (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Het Palet (634 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)7 Jul 2026
- Under offer1 Jul 2026
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 350,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 400,000
Property details
- Living area
- 87 m²
- Plot
- 142 m²
- Construction year
- 1999
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 361,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Tussen de Vaarten N.- Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated110 persons
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-9.6 mm/yr
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.71 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot86 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions14 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space49 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)71 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,413 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 9 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
70th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 20 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 233 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 336 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 167 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 25% of schools
58th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 420 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 4% of schools
80th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
18th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 369 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
41st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
77th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
1st percentile — low · 66% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 261 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
7th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 325 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 280 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 74% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 92 exam candidates
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · HAVO
38th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 195 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 197 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.