Price drops in and around Purmerend
More homes in and around Purmerend whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Purmerend, averaging −6.1%. The biggest cut was € 100.000 (Zuideinde 329, Amsterdam). Last updated 14 September.
All houses dropping in price in Purmerend →House prices and market figures in Purmerend →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Johanna Naberstraat 158
Apartment at Johanna Naberstraat 158 in Purmerend (Overwhere-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1962 and has 73 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Purmerend Overwhere (880 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool 't Carrousel (576 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 324,500−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale21 Aug 2026€ 339,500
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 33.2% With children+1.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 44.4% Single-person+4.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 22.4% Other multi-person−6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 50% Owner-occupied−7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 44% Social housing+16 pt vs the Netherlands
- 6% Private rental−8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 64.5% Dutch background−7.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 9% Rest of Europesame as the Netherlands
- 26.6% Outside Europe+8.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 30.8% Lower+4.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 46.9% Intermediate+6.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 22.4% Higher−10.9 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Overwhere-Zuid neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
265 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 34.9% Theft / burglary−4.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 35.6% Other+2.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12.3% Violence and threats+2.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 13% Vandalism+3.9 pt vs the Netherlands
- 4.2% Public order−4.5 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: more than sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
33 permits within 500 m · 46 construction plans within 1 km · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
67th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 49: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
22nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 302 pupils
Disadvantage score 73: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
59th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 286 pupils
Disadvantage score 2: more disadvantage than 16% of schools
49th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 129 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 486 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
78th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 23: more disadvantage than 63% of schools
60th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 392 pupils
Disadvantage score 83: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
32nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 189 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
57th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 315 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
81st percentile: high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
20th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 117 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · HAVO/VWO · 209 exam candidates
90th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO · 190 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/PRO
91st percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 102 exam candidates
67th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 75 exam candidates
90th percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 8 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

