Price drops in and around Ulft
More homes in and around Ulft whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 17 price cuts in and around Ulft, averaging −4.4%. The biggest cut was € 90.000 (Dijkweg 3, Gendringen). Last updated 17 September.
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
For sale-4.4%
For sale-3.7%
For sale-6.7%
For sale-9.3%
For sale-1.4%
For sale-4.1%
For sale-2.4%
For sale-6.1%
For sale-0.7%
For sale-6.7%
For sale-4.8%
Under offer-6.9%
For sale-3.6%
For sale-3.7%
Under offer-3.0%
For sale-2.8%
Under offer-4.5%
For sale-2.3%
For sale-4.2%
Sold-4.8%
For sale-11.6%For sale-2.9%
Off Funda-15.8%
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionIndicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Koepeloven 28
Semi-detached at Koepeloven 28 in Ulft (Ulft-Centrum en Ulft-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 2006 and has 172 m² of living space, a 250 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Terborg (4.3 km). The nearest primary school is Mariaschool (487 m).
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 549,500−€ 25,500
- Off Funda2 Sept 2026
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 575,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 27% With children−4.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 42.8% Single-person+2.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 30.2% Other multi-person+1.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 56% Owner-occupied−1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 34% Social housing+6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 10% Private rental−4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 83.5% Dutch background+11.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8.6% Rest of Europesame as the Netherlands
- 7.9% Outside Europe−10.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 38.7% Lower+12.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 43.2% Intermediate+2.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 18.2% Higher−15.1 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Ulft-Centrum en Ulft-Oost neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
93 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 37.4% Theft / burglary−1.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 22% Other−11.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 14.3% Violence and threats+4.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 9.9% Vandalismsame as the Netherlands
- 16.5% Public order+7.8 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: more than sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
19 permits within 500 m · 10 construction plans within 1 km · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
78th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
29th percentile: average · DIA · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 223 pupils
Disadvantage score 7: more disadvantage than 33% of schools
46th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 93 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 242 pupils
Disadvantage score 33: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 243 pupils
Disadvantage score 18: more disadvantage than 57% of schools
73rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 88 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 41% of schools
7th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 36: more disadvantage than 76% of schools
39th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 135 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
10th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 154 exam candidates
11th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 151 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.