Price drops in and around Amersfoort
More homes in and around Amersfoort whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Koestraat 41 A
Apartment at Koestraat 41 in Amersfoort (Grote Haag neighbourhood). The home was built in 1985 and has 120 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Amersfoort Centraal (1 km). The nearest primary school is P.C. basisschool Prins Willem Alexanderschool (195 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)29 Jun 2026
- Under offer24 Jun 2026
- Relisted13 Jun 2026€ 315,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 345,000
Property details
- Living area
- 120 m²
- Construction year
- 1985
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 294,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Grote Haag, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions2,059 kg/m2/yr
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby7
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.1%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,428 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical620 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.465 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away46.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)11.5 km
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Far away (>250 m)1.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
116 permits · 5 construction plans within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 335 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
52nd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 400 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 54% of schools
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 116 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 410 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 137 exam candidates
67th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
41st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 94% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 87 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 58 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 169 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
37th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 241 exam candidates
32nd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.