Price drops in and around Leidschendam
More homes in and around Leidschendam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Laurentiusweer 14
Semi-detached at Laurentiusweer 14 in Leidschendam (De Rietvink / Veursestraatweg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1991 and has 227 m² of living space, a 441 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Leidschendam-Voorburg (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Protestants Christelijke Samenwerkingsschool Emmaus (430 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted18 Jun 2026€ 999,000−€ 51,000
- For sale3 Jun 2026
- Off funda26 May 2026€ 1,050,000
Property details
- Living area
- 227 m²
- Plot
- 441 m²
- Construction year
- 1991
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 921,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Rietvink / Veursestraatweg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Soil standard exceeded
- Standard exceededYes
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.2 km
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure8
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 480,000
- Number of soil surveys
- Soil survey registered3
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot261 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average30%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space209 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)180 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential14,287 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,021 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 11 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
67th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 68 pupils · total 556 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
54th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 214 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 25% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
4th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
78th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 258 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 250 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 230 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 673 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 123 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 146 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
84th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 65 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 50 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 110 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.