Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Leksmondhof 217
Apartment at Leksmondhof 217 in Amsterdam (L-buurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1980 and has 71 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Gaasperplas (354 m). The nearest primary school is IKC Brasa (75 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer13 Jul 2026
- Relisted29 Jun 2026€ 299,500−€ 25,500
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 71 m²
- Construction year
- 1980
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 352,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in L-buurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside45%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.5
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated155 persons
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,230 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)128 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.514 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away16.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)13.8 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)3.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
52nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 62 pupils · total 511 pupils
Disadvantage score 168 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 111 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 238 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 119 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 406 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
25th percentile — low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 61 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.