Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Middenweg 221 2
Apartment at Middenweg 221 in Amsterdam (Middenmeer-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1929 and has 116 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Science Park (824 m). The nearest primary school is Lidwinaschool (277 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jun 2026€ 495,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 525,000
Property details
- Living area
- 116 m²
- Construction year
- 1929
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 541,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold end date: 15-06-2053)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Middenmeer-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.6%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated140 persons
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot295 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)149 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.525 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away11.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
37 permits within 500 m · 42 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 533 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 373 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 434 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 77 pupils · total 451 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 248 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 293 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 176 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
34th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 309 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 140 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
no recent test score · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
90th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.8 · MAVO · 58 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
17th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 101 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/PRO · 20 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 105 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 102 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO · 64 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.