Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Overhaalsgang 32
Apartment at Overhaalsgang 32 in Amsterdam (Kadijken neighbourhood). The home was built in 1988 and has 39 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Waterlooplein (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Alan Turingschool (291 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jun 2026€ 475,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale4 Jun 2026€ 495,000
Property details
- Living area
- 39 m²
- Construction year
- 1988
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 514,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold end date: 15-07-2039)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kadijken, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to military terrain
- On/directly adjacent to military site0.4 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors40.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated240 persons
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,210 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)188 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.624 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away9.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
29 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
79th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 421 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 396 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
66th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 18% of schools
49th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 346 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 317 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
57th percentile — average · DOE · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
15th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 150 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
84th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 154 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO · 64 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
18th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 102 exam candidates
58th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 33 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 116 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
27th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/PRO
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.