Price drops in and around Geleen
More homes in and around Geleen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Pastoor Schoenmaeckersstraat 17 D
Semi-detached at Pastoor Schoenmaeckersstraat 17 in Geleen (Lindenheuvel neighbourhood). The home was built in 1955 and has 94 m² of living space, a 180 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Geleen-Lutterade (1 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool 't Heuvelke (304 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted14 Jul 2026€ 289,000−€ 11,000
- Listed for sale29 Jun 2026€ 300,000
Property details
- Living area
- 94 m²
- Plot
- 180 m²
- Construction year
- 1955
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 261,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lindenheuvel, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- High2.7%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.4
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place10.39 ratio
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2044 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1117 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share24.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot108 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average40%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space62 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,482 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,026 kWh/kWp/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 299,000
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 283 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 487 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 2% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 54% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 251 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
64th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 318 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
86th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 51% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 84 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 146 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 25% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 404 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 10% of schools
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · PRO
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
67th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 293 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 104 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO · 214 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VWO · 88 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 75 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 274 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.