Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Prinses Margrietstraat 44 BS
Terraced house at Prinses Margrietstraat 44 in Utrecht (Schaakbuurt en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 1951 and has 47 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Zuilen (981 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Prinses Margriet (137 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted29 Jul 2026€ 450,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale17 Jun 2026€ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 47 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1951
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 483,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schaakbuurt en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated130 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1351 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share18.6%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.1%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.7%
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant324,115 i.e.
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby12
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.9%
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 548,000
- Distance to wind farm in development
- Wind farm in development within 3 km (indicative location)1.4 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance6.8%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.4 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.5 µg/kg
- Voltage level of nearest line
- Heavier line (150 kV)150 kV
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.8 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot6,392 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space74 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical490 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,150 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
31st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 42: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
16th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 309 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
63rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
57th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 32: more disadvantage than 74% of schools
8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 86% of schools
90th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 56% of schools
82nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 523 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
7th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 358 pupils
Disadvantage score 103: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
33rd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 185 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
5th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 168 pupils
Disadvantage score 78: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
39th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
11th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 142 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
21st percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
51st percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 61 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.