Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kanaalweg 81
Semi-detached at Kanaalweg 81 in Utrecht (Welgelegen, Den Hommel neighbourhood). The home was built in 1904 and has 85 m² of living space, a 325 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Graadt van Roggenweg (380 m). The nearest primary school is Kindercampus Molenpark (524 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 650,000−€ 175,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 825,000
Property details
- Living area
- 85 m²
- Plot
- 325 m²
- Construction year
- 1904
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 845,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Welgelegen, Den Hommel, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions91 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)495 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park28 m
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime100.6 per 1,000 residents
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 5.34
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby11
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk8.9%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.5%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby7
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 548,000
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.6 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise12.2%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOS in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Above living standard3.1 µg/kg
- Traffic on your own street
- Busy through traffic route6,000 per day
- Proportion of flexible employment contracts
- Much flexible work38.1%· NL 27%
- Distance to nearest asylum reception centre
- Nearby (<1 km)65 m
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot203 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space65 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical230 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,505 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield997 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
67th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 49% of schools
77th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
78th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 157 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 254 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 28% of schools
60th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 711 pupils
Disadvantage score 122: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
93rd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 309 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 36: more disadvantage than 76% of schools
71st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 80 pupils · total 535 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
92nd percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
8th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
73rd percentile: average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 160 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.6 · HAVO · 14 exam candidates
51st percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 61 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.