Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Bing Crosbypad 10
Apartment at Bing Crosbypad 10 in Utrecht (Terwijde-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 2018 and has 108 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Terwijde (354 m). The nearest primary school is Waterrijk (487 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jul 2026€ 525,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale7 Jun 2026€ 545,000
Property details
- Living area
- 108 m²
- Construction year
- 2018
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 629,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Terwijde-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.2 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0.5
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place3 ratio
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.7%
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 548,000
- Distance to railway line
- Close to railway166 m
- Distance to wind farm in development
- Wind farm in development within 3 km (indicative location)2.4 km
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away3.7 km
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Heavy train noise2.5%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.1 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.4%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources5
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,710 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average40%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits · 10 construction plans within 500 m · 28 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
59th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 5% of schools
39th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 352 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 616 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
86th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 621 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
77th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 289 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 5% of schools
86th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 485 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 594 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
60th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 339 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 47% of schools
99th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 104 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 233 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 258 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
39th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
67th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 413 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile: low · 72% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 141 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
45th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.