Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Amsterdamsestraatweg 180
Terraced house at Amsterdamsestraatweg 180 in Utrecht (2e Daalsebuurt en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 1925 and has 52 m² of living space, a 55 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is CS Jaarbeursplein (1 km). The nearest primary school is De Boemerang (522 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted28 Jul 2026€ 540,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 565,000
Property details
- Living area
- 52 m²
- Plot
- 55 m²
- Construction year
- 1925
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 310,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in 2e Daalsebuurt en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated190 persons
- Livability Meter: physical environment
- Unfavourable physical environment-0.0811 score
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m3
- Parking tariff
- Very high rate€ 5.34
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)5%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.2%
- Distance to railway line
- Very close to railway76 m
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant324,115 i.e.
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby12
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk8.2%
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside30%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors31.7%
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Building coverage percentage
- Almost completely built up100%
- Unbuilt plot area
- Almost completely built up0 m²
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 548,000
- Distance to nearest emission source
- nearby412 m
- Distance to wind farm in development
- Wind farm in development within 3 km (indicative location)2.9 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance6.2%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.7 µg/m³
- Estimated sun hours (winter)
- Virtually no winter sun0.5 hour
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- Elevated1.4%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space62 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical630 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,322 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.652 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 39 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
5th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 168 pupils
Disadvantage score 78: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
66th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 191 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
78th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 157 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
33rd percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 185 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
82nd percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 523 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
79th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 201 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 56% of schools
99th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 336 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 49% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 371 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
98th percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
51st percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 61 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
2nd percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO
11th percentile: low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 142 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.