Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
24/07/2026 | Bing Crosbypad 10 Utrecht | € 545.000 € 525.000 | -3.7% | 107 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Wageningseberg 164 Utrecht | € 495.000 € 465.000 | -6.1% | 77 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 37 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 41 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 47 Harmelen | € 381.000 € 320.000 | -16.0% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 39 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 49 Harmelen | € 372.000 € 320.000 | -14.0% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 43 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 45 Harmelen | € 359.000 € 320.000 | -10.9% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Bovenwoning 51 Harmelen | € 380.000 € 320.000 | -15.8% | 60 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Nieuwe Pijlsweerdstraat 75 Utrecht | € 462.500 € 420.000 | -9.2% | 70 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Briljantdrift 39 Nieuwegein | € 459.000 € 410.000 | -10.7% | 111 m²114 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Kloksteeg 17 Utrecht | € 475.000 € 450.000 | -5.3% | 67 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Gansstraat 12 B Utrecht | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 59 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Arubadreef 2 Utrecht | € 500.000 € 495.000 | -1.0% | 115 m²226 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | M. de Klerkstraat 2 Utrecht | € 510.000 € 420.000 | -17.6% | 115 m²90 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Herenweg 19 Maarssen | € 625.000 € 599.000 | -4.2% | 112 m²427 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Gruttersdijk 37 B Utrecht | € 479.000 € 450.000 | -6.0% | 62 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Albert van Dalsumlaan 249 Utrecht | € 465.000 € 440.000 | -5.4% | 76 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Washingtondreef 13 Utrecht | € 335.000 € 320.000 | -4.5% | 67 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Wageningseberg 164
Apartment at Wageningseberg 164 in Utrecht (Lunetten-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1992 and has 78 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Lunetten (966 m). The nearest primary school is Blauwe Aventurijn (221 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jul 2026€ 465,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale29 Jun 2026€ 495,000
Property details
- Living area
- 78 m²
- Construction year
- 1992
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 457,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Lunetten-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated125 persons
- Liveability scoreⓘ
- clearly below average-0.146 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1155 score
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime82.7 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside35.8%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors38.3%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.26 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels9%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 548,000
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site1.7 km
- Distance to main/through roadⓘ
- Right on main road68 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance7.1%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10.4 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- Elevated1.4%
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Multiple sources4
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot2,295 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical710 m³
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)ⓘ
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.577 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away38.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 46 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
68th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
85th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 312 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 38% of schools
98th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 31% of schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
83rd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 3: more disadvantage than 21% of schools
66th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 29% of schools
71st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 3% of schools
17th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21: more disadvantage than 60% of schools
13th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 13: more disadvantage than 48% of schools
92nd percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
8th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
88th percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
14th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 270 exam candidates
73rd percentile: average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 160 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.6 · HAVO · 14 exam candidates
92nd percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.