Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Radarweg 448
Apartment at Radarweg 448 in Amsterdam (Sloterdijk Stationskwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 2023 and has 130 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Sloterdijk (316 m). The nearest primary school is De Slotermeerschool (575 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 880,000−€ 100,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 980,000
Property details
- Living area
- 130 m²
- Construction year
- 2023
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 914,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Sloterdijk Stationskwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)447 m
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Strong rail nuisance4.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress50 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby35
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Wind turbines within 3 km
- Many wind turbines nearby10
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty13.6%
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,740 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions13 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)56 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.66 µg/m³
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away3,957 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
21 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 38 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 174 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 414 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.