Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Rijwoningen Erf 72
Terraced house at Ekangala 2 in Amsterdam (E-buurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2018 and has 90 m² of living space, a 210 m² plot, 1 bedroom and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Verrijn Stuartweg (373 m). The nearest primary school is Bijlmerhorst (500 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced10 Jun 2026€ 512,671−€ 14,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 526,671
Property details
- Living area
- 90 m²
- Plot
- 210 m²
- Construction year
- 2018
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 445,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in E-buurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated160 persons
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)5%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)88%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure8
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average38%
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,006 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.528 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away14.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)11.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
44th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 384 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 64 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 454 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
52nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
4th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
25th percentile — low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
6th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 72% passed · CE avg 5.9 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.