Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Toutenburgstraat 113
Apartment at Toutenburgstraat 113 in Amsterdam (Reigersbos 3 neighbourhood). The home was built in 1984 and has 59 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Reigersbos (528 m). The nearest primary school is Mobiel (504 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced4 Jun 2026€ 310,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 59 m²
- Construction year
- 1984
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 339,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Reigersbos 3, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.9%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental63%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.8 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated375 persons
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot9,270 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)184 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.542 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away17 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)14.9 km
- Distance to arable crop
- Far away (>250 m)1.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 15 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
19th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
40th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 120 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
8th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 135 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
42nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 238 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 406 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 178 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 119 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
4th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
25th percentile — low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 61 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.