Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Van Bleijswijckstraat 21
Terraced house at Van Bleijswijckstraat 21 in Tilburg (Hoefstraat Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 2017 and has 111 m² of living space, a 94 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is De Cocon (288 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced23 Jul 2026€ 450,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale4 Jun 2026€ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 111 m²
- Plot
- 94 m²
- Construction year
- 2017
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 431,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoefstraat Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated100 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1197 score
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High17.6%
- Buildings under construction in the neighbourhood
- intensive building activity13 buildings
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)85.6%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)81%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby21
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby15
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,963.7 mol/ha/yr
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44.4%
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources10
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 km
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby7
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)668 m
- Distance to tram/metro line
- Far away9.4 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance6.8%
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.7 µg/m³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.8%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- Elevated1.9%
- Borders overburden Natura 2000 area
- Borders congested areaYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated2.77 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.8 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential arearesidential area
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels41%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space74 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,098 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 11 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
18th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 17: more disadvantage than 55% of schools
90th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 36% of schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 94 pupils
Disadvantage score 10: more disadvantage than 42% of schools
81st percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile: high · AMN · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
41st percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
65th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 68 pupils · total 373 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 46% of schools
72nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 326 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 592 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
4th percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
17th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
13th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
89th percentile: high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
46th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
52nd percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.