Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Westerdoksdijk 461
Apartment at Westerdoksdijk 461 in Amsterdam (Westerdokseiland neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 110 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Centraal Station (902 m). The nearest primary school is Montessori Basisschool de Eilanden (229 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jun 2026€ 865,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 875,000
Property details
- Living area
- 110 m²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 898,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold end date: 01-10-2054)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Westerdokseiland, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive56 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby19
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby7
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk8.3%
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)15,000 per day
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park30 m
- Green share within 500 m
- Little greenery4%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated245 persons
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,669 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions15 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)64 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical740 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.588 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
55th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 316 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 34% of schools
31st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 366 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 359 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 83 pupils · total 560 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 390 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 2% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
38th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 88 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
36th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 27 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 25 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 58% passed · CE avg 5.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.