Price drops in and around Schiedam
More homes in and around Schiedam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Burgemeester Gijsenlaan 36
Apartment at Burgemeester Gijsenlaan 36 in Schiedam (Wibautbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1950 and has 45 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Troelstralaan (376 m). The nearest primary school is IBS Ababil (148 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 210,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 225,000
Property details
- Living area
- 45 m²
- Construction year
- 1950
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 195,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 30 June 2049)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Wibautbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated170 persons
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.2129 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2079 score
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.2 km
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)73.1%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)63.8%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure7
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.4%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors39.5%
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.26 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 2
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels6%
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Distance to airport
- Nearby5.5 km
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.3%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources5
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated3 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,365 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical710 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.448 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away26.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)28.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 576 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
32nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
44th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
19th percentile: low · DOE · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 250 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 486 pupils
Disadvantage score 135: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 159 pupils
Disadvantage score 64: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
8th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 222 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 30% of schools
17th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 609 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · PRO
43rd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
28th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 145 exam candidates
18th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
20th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VWO · 78 exam candidates
34th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 243 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.