Price drops in and around Vlaardingen
More homes in and around Vlaardingen whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Drevenpark 105
Apartment at Drevenpark 105 in Vlaardingen (Park Holy Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 2006 and has 141 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Schiedam Nieuwland (2.8 km). The nearest primary school is IKC De Ark (144 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted27 Jul 2026€ 650,000−€ 25,000
- Under offer17 Jul 2026
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 675,000
Property details
- Living area
- 141 m²
- Construction year
- 2006
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 625,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Park Holy Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away11 km
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)9%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater33 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.28 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of renewable energy
- moderate share sustainable34%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels5%
- Distance to airport
- Nearby6.5 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- High flight nuisance12.4%
- Serious noise nuisance from wind turbines (neighbourhood)
- Much turbine nuisance1.5%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)
- Elevated3 µg/kg
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.1 °C
- Distance to indoor swimming pool
- Further away3.5 km
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,041 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)117 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical640 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values12.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.312 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away29.9 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)31.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 48 construction plans within 500 m · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 359 pupils
Disadvantage score 96: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
39th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 387 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 366 pupils
94th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 384 pupils
Disadvantage score 80: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
45th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 265 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 28% of schools
46th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
30th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 92: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
9th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 407 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 271 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
7th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 62 exam candidates
28th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 75 exam candidates
29th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 182 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · VBO
20th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VWO · 78 exam candidates
9th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 243 exam candidates
18th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
43rd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 168 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.