Price drops in and around Amersfoort
More homes in and around Amersfoort whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Achter de Kamp 208
Terraced house at Achter de Kamp 208 in Amersfoort (Beestenmarkt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1984 and has 140 m² of living space, a 210 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Amersfoort Centraal (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is ikc Vlinderslag (657 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 435,000−€ 40,000
- Listed for sale10 Jun 2026€ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 140 m²
- Plot
- 210 m²
- Construction year
- 1984
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- —
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Beestenmarkt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4.3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside38.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.6%
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area20
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated145 persons
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions19 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space816 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)99 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical700 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential13,798 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield986 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values13%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
50 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 41 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 278 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 410 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 116 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 54% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 55 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 257 pupils
Disadvantage score 92 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
41st percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 169 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
32nd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
29th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 58 exam candidates
89th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 137 exam candidates
41st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 139 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.