Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Ampèrestraat 29 BS
Terraced house at Ampèrestraat 29 in Utrecht (Elinkwijk en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 1936 and has 75 m² of living space, a 89 m² plot, 1 bedroom and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Zuilen (830 m). The nearest primary school is KBS Ludger (147 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 399,000−€ 21,000
- Listed for sale19 Jun 2026€ 420,000
Property details
- Living area
- 75 m²
- Plot
- 89 m²
- Construction year
- 1936
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 443,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Elinkwijk en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby12
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside34.3%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors33.2%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated255 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space83 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,768 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
16th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 309 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
31st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
63rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
57th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
82nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 523 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
33rd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 185 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 358 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 168 pupils
Disadvantage score 78 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
39th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
11th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 142 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 258 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.