Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Aurikelstraat 105
Apartment at Aurikelstraat 105 in Amsterdam (Bloemenbuurt-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1925 and has 62 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Noorderpark (985 m). The nearest primary school is Montessorischool Azalea (255 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted25 Jun 2026€ 665,000−€ 34,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 699,000
Property details
- Living area
- 62 m²
- Construction year
- 1925
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 521,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bloemenbuurt-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside43.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.4%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental67%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,165 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)153 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.562 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away8.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)4.4 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
16 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 420 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 92 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
50th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 166 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 83 pupils · total 560 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 228 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
33rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 364 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
19th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 153 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
38th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 88 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · HAVO/VWO · 96 exam candidates
64th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 90 exam candidates
38th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
4th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO · 25 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 58% passed · CE avg 5.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 12 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.