Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Bos en Lommerplein 82
Apartment at Bos en Lommerplein 82 in Amsterdam (Bosleeuw neighbourhood). The home was built in 2003 and has 80 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is De Vlugtlaan (599 m). The nearest primary school is Enderun Hisar Amsterdam (127 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted28 Jul 2026€ 525,000−€ 25,000
- Under offer1 Jul 2026
- Listed for sale11 Jun 2026€ 550,000
Property details
- Living area
- 80 m²
- Construction year
- 2003
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 578,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bosleeuw, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated240 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1477 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1241 score
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)13%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)72.4%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)73%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure26
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity7
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby31
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)13,500 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside36.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors31.7%
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance to airport
- Nearby9.6 km
- Distance to motorway
- Nearby140 m
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.4 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise12.6%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources3
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated7.4%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facility
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot8,450 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical570 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.661 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
24 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 44 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 24% of schools
13th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
38th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
56th percentile: average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 22: more disadvantage than 62% of schools
51st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 41: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43: more disadvantage than 81% of schools
94th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 414 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
14th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
75th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15: more disadvantage than 52% of schools
0th percentile: low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
10th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
0th percentile: low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
0th percentile: low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
1st percentile: low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
43rd percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.