Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Daendelsstraat 53
Terraced house at Daendelsstraat 53 in Tilburg (Armhoef Noord-West neighbourhood). The home was built in 1931 and has 90 m² of living space, a 101 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Armhoefse Akker (233 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)16 Jul 2026
- Under offer11 Jul 2026
- Price reduced30 Jun 2026€ 325,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 340,000
Property details
- Living area
- 90 m²
- Plot
- 101 m²
- Construction year
- 1931
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 357,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Armhoef Noord-West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby10
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,963.7 mol/ha/yr
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated130 persons
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot197 m above sea level
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions51 kg/m2/yr
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average35%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space63 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,398 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield995 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.734 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away38.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
84th percentile — high · AMN · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 94 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
72nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 326 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile — average · AMN · grade 8: 96 pupils · total 606 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
38th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 138 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
90th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 592 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 73 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
17th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 128 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 288 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 184 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 148 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.