Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dr H.J. van Mooklaan 185
Apartment at Dr H.J. van Mooklaan 185 in Rijswijk (Stervoorde neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 90 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is Het Kristal (117 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced9 Jun 2026€ 324,500−€ 25,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 90 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 294,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stervoorde, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental65%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.9 km
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated110 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,995 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.943 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away37.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)41.9 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance1.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 722 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
58th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 350 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 460 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
96th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 326 exam candidates
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 15 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.