Price drops in and around Enschede
More homes in and around Enschede whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Floresstraat 102
Terraced house at Floresstraat 102 in Enschede (Hogeland-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1956 and has 131 m² of living space, a 422 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Enschede (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Willem Wilmink (225 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced16 Jun 2026€ 419,000−€ 31,000
- Listed for sale29 May 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 131 m²
- Plot
- 422 m²
- Construction year
- 1956
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 410,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hogeland-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable7%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.6%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High3.7%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.3%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot223 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space103 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential7,044 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Good yield974 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.3%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.618 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 18 construction plans within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 92 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
54th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 333 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
58th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 348 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 107 pupils · total 718 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 14% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 94 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 534 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
96th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 192 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 212 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
50th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 162 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 314 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.