Price drops in and around Tilburg
More homes in and around Tilburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Gardiaanhof 41
Apartment at Gardiaanhof 41 in Tilburg (Sint Anna Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 2008 and has 42 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Tilburg (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Triangel (453 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted1 Jul 2026€ 260,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 275,000
Property details
- Living area
- 42 m²
- Construction year
- 2008
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 222,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Sint Anna Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Nitrogen deposition in the neighbourhood
- High nitrogen deposition1,766 mol/ha/yr
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside31.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,137 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)154 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.753 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away37.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)23.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 5 construction plans within 500 m · 48 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
33rd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 260 pupils
Disadvantage score 96 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 592 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 273 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
28th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 67 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
no recent test score · total 276 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
54th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 157 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
81st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 281 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile — average · AMN · grade 8: 96 pupils · total 606 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 41% of schools
90th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 572 pupils
Disadvantage score 8 — more disadvantage than 36% of schools
72nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 326 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.7 · HAVO/VWO · 110 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 113 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 288 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 184 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 148 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
52nd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 116 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.