Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Generaal Eisenhowerplein 186
Apartment at Generaal Eisenhowerplein 186 in Rijswijk (Stationskwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1997 and has 134 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (60 m). The nearest primary school is CBS Melodie (296 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced3 Jul 2026€ 449,500−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 469,500
Property details
- Living area
- 134 m²
- Construction year
- 1997
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 449,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stationskwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to railway line
- Very close to railway27 m
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Hospitality within 25 m
- Hospitality within 25 m1
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated155 persons
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime118.5 per 1,000 residents
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,512 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)160 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical470 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.939 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away37.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)42.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
58th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 722 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 432 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
44th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 227 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.