Price drops in and around Voorburg
More homes in and around Voorburg whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Henry Hagalaan 20
Apartment at Henry Hagalaan 20 in Voorburg (Voorburg Midden noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1965 and has 79 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Voorburg 't Loo (335 m). The nearest primary school is Kindcentrum Cascade (194 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)7 Jul 2026
- Under offer30 Jun 2026
- Relisted4 Jun 2026€ 349,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 359,000
Property details
- Living area
- 79 m²
- Construction year
- 1965
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 324,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Voorburg Midden noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors41.9%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental62%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated115 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot796 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical680 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.806 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away38.8 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)45.8 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 26 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
32nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 503 pupils
Disadvantage score 83 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 455 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
46th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 414 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 250 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 337 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 86 pupils · total 625 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
44th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 233 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 110 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 50 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.