Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hooft Graaflandstraat 15
Terraced house at Hooft Graaflandstraat 15 in Utrecht (Oud Hoograven-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1936 and has 106 m² of living space, a 121 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Kanaleneiland-Zuid (728 m). The nearest primary school is Da Costa Basisschool Hoograven (438 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)24 Jun 2026
- Under offer17 Jun 2026
- Relisted3 Jun 2026€ 669,000−€ 27,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 696,000
Property details
- Living area
- 106 m²
- Plot
- 121 m²
- Construction year
- 1936
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 673,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud Hoograven-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.8%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated140 persons
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.39 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average30%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space66 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)152 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical740 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,592 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield999 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
38 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
98th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 215 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 115 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 312 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 219 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 29% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
83rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 21% of schools
73rd percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 160 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.6 · HAVO · 14 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
45th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.