Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kleiburg 607
Apartment at Kleiburg 607 in Amsterdam (Bijlmermuseum-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 68 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Kraaiennest (317 m). The nearest primary school is Samenspel (523 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026€ 325,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale10 Jun 2026€ 335,000
Property details
- Living area
- 68 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 340,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bijlmermuseum-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty10.3%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated165 persons
- Liveability class
- Inadequateinsufficient
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.3878 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.2159 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1659 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)21%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)72.9%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)68.3%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.6%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater17 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.03 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designation
- Cultural-historical valueValue - Cultural heritage
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of renewable energy
- moderate share sustainable41%
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels1%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance to airport
- Nearby14.6 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- High flight nuisance11.7%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- High heat stress40 °C
- Heat stress class
- High heat stresssterk
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,440 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions18 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)87 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical60 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
21st percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 62 pupils · total 511 pupils
Disadvantage score 168: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 454 pupils
Disadvantage score 48: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
52nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
14th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
10th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
5th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
44th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
77th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 64: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
4th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
25th percentile: low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
1st percentile: low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
6th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
39th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
2nd percentile: low · 76% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.