Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Gooise Kant 85
Terraced house at Gooise Kant 85 in Amsterdam (Gooise Kant neighbourhood). The home was built in 2018 and has 107 mΒ² of living space, a 107 mΒ² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Kraaiennest (888 m). The nearest primary school is De Blauwe Lijn (317 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced31 Jul 2026β¬ 595,000ββ¬ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 630,000
Property details
- Living area
- 107 mΒ²
- Plot
- 107 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 2018
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- β¬ 622,000
- Ownership
- β
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Gooise Kant, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated135 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1099 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)3%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)
- Very high groundwater19 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Leasehold or freehold
- LeaseholdYes
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average⬠575,000
- Distance to main/through road
- Right on main road68 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby13.8 km
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- High flight nuisance10.3%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- Elevated6.2%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Below the national average50.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average54.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot56 mΒ²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average35%
- Calculated COβ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space63 mΒ²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 mΒ³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,459 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m Β· 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
3rd percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 37 pupils Β· total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
14th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
52nd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 18 pupils Β· total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
11th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 21 pupils Β· total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 111: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
8th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 24 pupils Β· total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 119: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
77th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 38 pupils Β· total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 64: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
6th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
44th percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 35 pupils Β· total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28: more disadvantage than 69% of schools
10th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 26 pupils Β· total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 79% of schools
5th percentile: low Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 20 pupils Β· total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
4th percentile: low Β· 81% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 282 exam candidates
no exam results Β· HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile: low Β· 79% passed Β· CE avg 5.8 Β· VBO/MAVO Β· 33 exam candidates
25th percentile: low Β· 95% passed Β· CE avg 6.1 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO Β· 38 exam candidates
no exam results Β· PRO
1st percentile: low Β· 69% passed Β· CE avg 5.9 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 118 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
6th percentile: low Β· 86% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 7 exam candidates
1st percentile: low Β· 72% passed Β· CE avg 5.9 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 158 exam candidates
39th percentile: average Β· 90% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 271 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.