Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Ξ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
31/07/2026 | Anton Verheijstraat 9 4 Amsterdam | β¬ 895.000 β¬ 875.000 | -2.2% | 108 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Straat van Magelhaens 29 Amstelveen | β¬ 900.000 β¬ 895.000 | -0.6% | 177 mΒ²85 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Narva-eiland 143 Amsterdam | β¬ 1.675.000 β¬ 1.500.000 | -10.4% | 168 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Brouwersgracht 155 E Amsterdam | β¬ 895.000 β¬ 700.000 | -21.8% | 102 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Kloekhorststraat 25 Amsterdam | β¬ 315.000 β¬ 295.000 | -6.3% | 43 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Gooise Kant 85 Amsterdam | β¬ 630.000 β¬ 595.000 | -5.6% | 102 mΒ²107 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Amstelveenseweg 160 3 Amsterdam | β¬ 549.000 β¬ 517.500 | -5.7% | 57 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Korte Ouderkerkerdijk 1 X2 Amsterdam | β¬ 4.450.000 β¬ 4.400.000 | -1.1% | 334 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Sumatraplantsoen 22 A Amsterdam | β¬ 475.000 β¬ 450.000 | -5.3% | 65 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Bermuda 14 Zaandam | β¬ 499.000 β¬ 450.000 | -9.8% | 121 mΒ²143 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Herengracht 270 N Amsterdam | β¬ 1.000.000 β¬ 985.000 | -1.5% | 101 mΒ² | |||
31/07/2026 | Sinjeur Semeynsstraat 90 6 Amsterdam | β¬ 400.000 β¬ 395.000 | -1.3% | 80 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Admiraliteitstraat 21 Amsterdam | β¬ 425.000 β¬ 420.000 | -1.2% | 57 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Kapzaag 12 Zaandam | β¬ 400.000 β¬ 365.000 | -8.8% | 90 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Sumatrastraat 37 1 Amsterdam | β¬ 525.000 β¬ 495.000 | -5.7% | 54 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Sumatrastraat 35 C Amsterdam | β¬ 450.000 β¬ 425.000 | -5.6% | 57 mΒ² | |||
30/07/2026 | Willem Pijperstraat 71 Amsterdam | β¬ 2.750.000 β¬ 2.700.000 | -1.8% | 245 mΒ²201 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Wolbrantskerkweg 201 A Amsterdam | β¬ 450.000 β¬ 425.000 | -5.6% | 80 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Ferdinand Bolstraat 123 C Amsterdam | β¬ 435.000 β¬ 400.000 | -8.1% | 51 mΒ² | |||
29/07/2026 | Donau 122 Amstelveen | β¬ 565.000 β¬ 549.000 | -2.8% | 97 mΒ² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Anton Verheijstraat 9 4
Apartment at Anton Verheijstraat 9 in Amsterdam (Prinses Irenebuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1956 and has 109 mΒ² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label F. The nearest railway station is Zuid (474 m). The nearest primary school is Eerste Openluchtschool voor het Gezonde Kind (509 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026β¬ 875,000ββ¬ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026β¬ 895,000
Property details
- Living area
- 109 mΒ²
- Construction year
- 1956
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- F
- WOZ value
- β¬ 866,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- β
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ historyβ¦
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Prinses Irenebuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyβ
- Low share renewable0%
- Energy index (primary fossil)β
- Poor (label F/G)358 kWh/mΒ²/yr
- Energy labelβ
- PoorF
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsβ
- High crime120.9 per 1,000 residents
- Permits <500 m (12 months)β
- Much building pressure43
- Permits <500 m (3 months)β
- Very high construction activity13
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)β
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)β
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayβ
- Extreme heat stress43 Β°C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmβ
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress classβ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Flood risk classβ
- High flood risklarge
- Leasehold or freeholdβ
- LeaseholdYes
- Shared plotβ
- Shared plotYes
- Calculated COβ emissionsβ
- Elevated emissions66 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumptionβ
- Above average1,130 mΒ³
- Average WOZ value (municipality)β
- Above national average⬠575,000
- Distance to airportβ
- Nearby8.5 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)β
- Elevated10.1 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)β
- Elevated1.5%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmβ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- PFOA in soil (nearest measurement point)β
- Elevated2.87 Β΅g/kg
- Building statusβ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)β
- Very generous plot870 mΒ²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)β
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmβ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SOββ
- Very low0.626 Β΅g/mΒ³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityβ
- Far away8.5 km
- Distance to biomass plantβ
- At distance (>3 km)7.1 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceβ
- ample distance1.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineβ
- Far away (>2 km)7 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mastβ
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood315 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
42 permits within 500 m Β· 41 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permitβs description.
Schools
99th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 240 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 31 pupils Β· total 259 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 38 pupils Β· total 288 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile: average Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 70 pupils Β· total 441 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high Β· IEP Β· grade 8: 25 pupils Β· total 299 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
80th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 45 pupils Β· total 368 pupils
Disadvantage score 9: more disadvantage than 40% of schools
97th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 30 pupils Β· total 224 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 44 pupils Β· total 1340 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 55 pupils Β· total 405 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile: high Β· LIB Β· grade 8: 28 pupils Β· total 227 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
21st percentile: low Β· 88% passed Β· CE avg 6.3 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 202 exam candidates
16th percentile: low Β· 83% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 173 exam candidates
92nd percentile: high Β· 93% passed Β· CE avg 6.9 Β· VWO Β· 120 exam candidates
43rd percentile: average Β· 92% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 229 exam candidates
no exam results Β· HAVO/VWO
99th percentile: high Β· 97% passed Β· CE avg 7.1 Β· VWO Β· 105 exam candidates
15th percentile: low Β· 83% passed Β· CE avg 6.4 Β· HAVO/VWO Β· 196 exam candidates
3rd percentile: low Β· 79% passed Β· CE avg 6.0 Β· MAVO/HAVO/VWO Β· 169 exam candidates
no exam results Β· VWO
35th percentile: average Β· 86% passed Β· CE avg 6.5 Β· VWO Β· 186 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data Β· raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.