Price drops in and around Zaandam
More homes in and around Zaandam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
31/07/2026 | Bermuda 14 Zaandam | € 499.000 € 450.000 | -9.8% | 121 m²143 m² | |||
31/07/2026 | Herengracht 270 N Amsterdam | € 1.000.000 € 985.000 | -1.5% | 101 m² | |||
31/07/2026 | Sinjeur Semeynsstraat 90 6 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 80 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Admiraliteitstraat 21 Amsterdam | € 425.000 € 420.000 | -1.2% | 57 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Donaulaan 104 Purmerend | € 699.000 € 664.000 | -5.0% | 137 m²254 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Kapzaag 12 Zaandam | € 400.000 € 365.000 | -8.8% | 90 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Sumatrastraat 37 1 Amsterdam | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 54 m² | |||
30/07/2026 | Sumatrastraat 35 C Amsterdam | € 450.000 € 425.000 | -5.6% | 57 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Wolbrantskerkweg 201 A Amsterdam | € 450.000 € 425.000 | -5.6% | 80 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Aalbersestraat 242 G Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 87 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Oeverpad 280 Amsterdam | € 445.000 € 425.000 | -4.5% | 97 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Luceberthof 3 Heemskerk | € 525.000 € 495.000 | -5.7% | 78 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Vlietsend 49 L Krommenie | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 49 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Zuideinde 11 Wormerveer | € 1.150.000 € 995.000 | -13.5% | 231 m²481 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Bos en Lommerplein 82 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 80 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Rosmolenstraat 36 A Zaandam | € 499.000 € 449.000 | -10.0% | 85 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 123 1 Amsterdam | € 395.000 € 365.000 | -7.6% | 50 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Falckstraat 31 H Amsterdam | € 2.650.000 € 2.495.000 | -5.8% | 188 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Van Suchtelen van de Haarestraat 83 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 91 m² | |||
25/07/2026 | Cruquiuskade 5 Amsterdam | € 1.145.000 € 1.095.000 | -4.4% | 126 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Bermuda 14
Terraced house at Bermuda 14 in Zaandam (Bomenbuurt Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 2006 and has 143 m² of living space, a 143 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Zaandam (2.1 km). The nearest primary school is De Kernschool (382 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 450,000−€ 49,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 499,000
Property details
- Living area
- 143 m²
- Plot
- 143 m²
- Construction year
- 2006
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 409,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bomenbuurt Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated200 persons
- Liveability classⓘ
- Weakweak
- Liveability scoreⓘ
- clearly below average-0.2444 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1656 score
- Net labour participationⓘ
- Low58%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhoodⓘ
- Predominantly social rental78%
- Distance to charging pointⓘ
- No charging point in the neighbourhood1.5 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0.4
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)72.4%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)59%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance11%
- Noise loadⓘ
- Loud68 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Severely disruptive59 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High1.9%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby36
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby11
- Environmental health risk (MGR)ⓘ
- High environmental health risk7.8%
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside36%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors32.7%
- Wind turbines within 3 kmⓘ
- Many wind turbines nearby9
- Foundation riskⓘ
- High risklarge
- In area with induced earthquakesⓘ
- In earthquake zoneYes
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.39 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)860 m
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby14.6 km
- Distance to wind farm in developmentⓘ
- Wind farm in development within 3 km (indicative location)2.8 km
- Distance to tram/metro lineⓘ
- Far away4 km
- Road traffic noiseⓘ
- Considerable noise14.5%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.4%
- Near waste incinerator/biomass facilityⓘ
- Within ~5 km of waste incinerator / biomass facilityYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.5 °C
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space56 m²
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,467 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield994 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.73 µg/m³
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Far from rail1.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
no recent test score · total 112 pupils
Disadvantage score 34: more disadvantage than 75% of schools
31st percentile: average · DOE · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 398 pupils
Disadvantage score 66: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
75th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 385 pupils
Disadvantage score 59: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
25th percentile: average · DOE · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
12th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
16th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 76 pupils · total 601 pupils
Disadvantage score 95: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
3rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 71: more disadvantage than 93% of schools
38th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 222 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile: low · DOE · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 36: more disadvantage than 76% of schools
5th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 59: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
53rd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 143 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
62nd percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 128 exam candidates
1st percentile: low · 71% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
15th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 191 exam candidates
73rd percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 202 exam candidates
43rd percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
60th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
0th percentile: low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.