Price drops in and around Haarlem
More homes in and around Haarlem whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Landschot 102
Apartment at Landschot 102 in Haarlem (Saeftinge-Nemelaar neighbourhood). The home was built in 1983 and has 68 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Heemstede-Aerdenhout (3.4 km). The nearest primary school is De Molenwiek Dalton (139 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)7 Jul 2026
- Relisted17 Jun 2026€ 300,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale31 May 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 68 m²
- Construction year
- 1983
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 335,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Saeftinge-Nemelaar, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.8 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated155 persons
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)3%
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources7
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue – Archaeology 4
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,164 m²
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average39%
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)166 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.594 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away11.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 7 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
97th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 88 pupils · total 484 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 243 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 104 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 21% of schools
94th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 203 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO
no exam results · HAVO
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 167 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 77 exam candidates
24th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 212 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.