Price drops in and around Spijkenisse
More homes in and around Spijkenisse whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Laningpad 2
Detached at Laningpad 2 in Spijkenisse (Hoogwerf-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1933 and has 143 m² of living space, a 442 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Spijkenisse Centrum (1 km). The nearest primary school is Protestants Christelijke Basisschool de Rank (405 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced21 Jul 2026€ 585,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 620,000
Property details
- Living area
- 143 m²
- Plot
- 442 m²
- Construction year
- 1933
- Property type
- Detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 479,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hoogwerf-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions87 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)475 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.1%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive56 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby32
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Building coverage percentage
- Plenty of open land26%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot280 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average32%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space145 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential10,606 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,047 kWh/kWp/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits · 247 construction plans within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 446 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 55 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 21% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 262 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 18 — more disadvantage than 57% of schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 373 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
36th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
37th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 199 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 179 exam candidates
96th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
66th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO
34th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.