Price drops in and around Haarlem
More homes in and around Haarlem whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Leonard Springerlaan 143
Apartment at Leonard Springerlaan 143 in Haarlem (Kunstschildersbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2005 and has 102 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Haarlem Spaarnwoude (1.2 km). The nearest primary school is IBS De Eenheid (143 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jun 2026€ 550,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 575,000
Property details
- Living area
- 102 m²
- Construction year
- 2005
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 537,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kunstschildersbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Very nearby (within risk contour)110 m
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby12
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental66%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated225 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1424 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1223 score
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot14,920 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical640 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.5%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.729 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away9.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)9.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)6.9 km
- Distance to military terrain
- Well away from military terrain7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
15 permits within 500 m · 10 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
no recent test score · total 28 pupils
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 400 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 5% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 39% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 374 pupils
Disadvantage score 59 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 104 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
57th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 243 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
no exam results · HAVO
no exam results · HAVO
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 167 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
96th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 126 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.