Price drops in and around Haarlem
More homes in and around Haarlem whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Leonardo da Vinciplein 9
Apartment at Leonardo da Vinciplein 9 in Haarlem (Archimedesbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2007 and has 106 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Haarlem Spaarnwoude (3.1 km). The nearest primary school is De Meer (119 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced10 Jun 2026€ 450,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026€ 475,000
Property details
- Living area
- 106 m²
- Construction year
- 2007
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 476,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Archimedesbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress49 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.9%
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental73%
- Severe loneliness (neighbourhood)
- High18.9%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated90 persons
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,397 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions20 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)109 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values8.5%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.724 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away10.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)10 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 8 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
68th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 209 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 243 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 423 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 365 pupils
Disadvantage score 104 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 360 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 305 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 370 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
35th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
83rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 167 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO
no exam results · HAVO
94th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 203 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
13th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 77 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
24th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 212 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.