Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Livingstonelaan 164
Apartment at Livingstonelaan 164 in Utrecht (Kanaleneiland-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1965 and has 75 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Winkelcentrum Kanaleneiland (368 m). The nearest primary school is De Olijfboom (250 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)16 Jul 2026
- Under offer9 Jul 2026
- Relisted13 Jun 2026€ 300,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 315,000
Property details
- Living area
- 75 m²
- Construction year
- 1965
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 351,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kanaleneiland-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.7%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby8
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside32%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors31.6%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,028 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical260 m³
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.616 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away37.7 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)24.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
60th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 711 pupils
Disadvantage score 122 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 304 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 74 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 8 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 21 — more disadvantage than 60% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 90 pupils · total 509 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 160 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.6 · HAVO · 14 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
92nd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 46 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO
45th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
8th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 274 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
88th percentile — high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 172 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.