Price drops in and around Utrecht
More homes in and around Utrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
M. de Klerkstraat 2
Terraced house at M. de Klerkstraat 2 in Utrecht (Prins Bernhardplein en omgeving neighbourhood). The home was built in 1931 and has 87 m² of living space, a 90 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Utrecht Zuilen (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool de Cirkel (486 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted21 Jul 2026€ 420,000−€ 90,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 510,000
Property details
- Living area
- 87 m²
- Plot
- 90 m²
- Construction year
- 1931
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 509,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Prins Bernhardplein en omgeving, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby15
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby11
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35.3%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.1282 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average28%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space41 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical720 m³
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield990 kWh/kWp/yr
- Housing market throughput (sales per year)
- High throughput3.55%
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.607 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 31 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
63rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
16th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 309 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 48% of schools
31st percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 42 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
57th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 120 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 358 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
8th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 354 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
82nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 523 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 185 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
21st percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 622 pupils
Disadvantage score 154 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
39th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 159 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
11th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 142 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 258 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 144 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.